ArticleHaematologica2026
Olverembatinib in accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: efficacy and safety evaluation.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied 130 consecutive subjects who presented with (N=29) or transformed to (N=101) accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and who received olverembatinib. Sixty-two were in second chronic phase. All failed ≥1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and 91 had BCR::ABL1T315I. Median follow-up was 28 months (interquartile range, 10-74 months). The 6-year cumulative incidences of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response and molecular response 4.0 were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49- 69), 53% (95% CI: 42-62), 52% (95% CI: 41-62) and 42% (95% CI: 31- 53), respectively. The 6-year probabilities of transformation-free survival (TFS), CML-related survival and survival were 81% (95% CI: 72-90), 76% (95% CI: 67-87%) and 71% (95% CI: 61-82), respectively. In multi-variable analyses, an interval from diagnosis of CML to olverembatinib start <29 months, failure to achieve complete hematologic response on prior TKI therapy, hemoglobin concentration <98 g/L, blood and/or bone marrow blasts ≥8%, and/or high-risk additional chromosome abnormalities at the start of olverembatinib therapy, as well as not achieving early MCyR on olverembatinib correlated with worse outcomes. RUNX1 and STAT5A variants were significantly associated with worse TFS in the 82 subjects with targeted DNA-sequencing data. There were acceptable treatment-related adverse events. We conclude olverembatinib is effective and tolerable in subjects in accelerated-phase CML failing prior TKI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.