Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098077›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Integrated response of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) cardiovascular system to hypoxia acclimation.

Elizabeth A Manchester, Todd E Gillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A ManchesterDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1.ORCID 0009-0000-0776-524X
Todd E GillisDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1.ORCID 0000-0002-8585-0658

Funding

Department of Fisheries and OceansNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNSERCUniversity of Guelph
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic hypoxia exposure of fish can cause remodelling of the gills as well as increases to haematocrit and haemoglobin binding affinity. There is less known, however, about how chronic hypoxia affects the structure and function of the heart. In the current study, zebrafish were exposed to moderate hypoxia for 7 weeks and then ultrasound was used to characterize cardiac function. We found that cardiac output of the hypoxia-acclimated fish was greater than that of the control fish during an acute hypoxia exposure. This difference was due, at least in part, to the higher cardiac stroke volume. Histological measurements demonstrated an increase in the cross-sectional area of the ventricle of hypoxia-exposed fish and this was supported by higher end diastolic area measurements made using ultrasound. These changes to the heart occurred in conjunction with an increase in haematocrit and the respiratory surface area of the gills, as well as an improved capacity of the fish to respond to a more severe acute hypoxia challenge. We also found an increase in the expression of the gene transcripts for hif-1αa and vegfaa at 24 h, 3 days and 8 days of hypoxia exposure, suggesting a rapid and consistent response. Our results suggest that, unlike normoxia-acclimated fish which demonstrate a decrease in cardiac output with acute hypoxia exposure, zebrafish acclimated to hypoxia maintain cardiac output when acutely exposed to hypoxia.

Indexed as

AcclimatizationCardiovascular SystemHypoxiaZebrafishAnimalsCardiac OutputGillsHeartHematocritHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitCardiac remodellingEnvironmental eutrophicationHypoxia tolerance

Identifiers

PMID41098077
PMCPMC12669836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.