Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41098041›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2026

Evolutionary dynamics of the chloroplast genome in Daphne (Thymelaeaceae): comparative analysis with related genera and insights into phylogenetics.

Abdullah, Hui Li, Rushan Yan, Chengyu Chen, Madiha Islam, Abdul Majid, Ibrar Ahmed, Parviz Heidari, Xiaoxuan Tian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  5. Characterization ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. Chloroplast Genome Characterization ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

AbdullahState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-8478
Hui LiState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Rushan YanState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Chengyu ChenState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.
Madiha IslamDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Abdul MajidDepartment of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Ibrar AhmedAlpha Genomics Private Limited, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Parviz HeidariFaculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-0143
Xiaoxuan TianState Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Modernization, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-9943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family Thymelaeaceae Juss., includes numerous botanically and medicinally important species, yet its taxonomy, particularly within the genus Daphne Tourn. ex L., remains unresolved. In the present study, we sequenced and de novo assembled the chloroplast (cp) genome of Daphne mucronata Royle from Pakistan and assembled cp genomes of four additional Daphne species, one Dirca L. species and two Thymelaea Mill. species using public raw data. Comparative analyses across 14 genera, including 17 Daphne species, revealed substantial structural variation in cp genomes. The cp genomes contained 111-112 unique genes, including 77-78 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes and four rRNA genes. When considering duplicated copies in the inverted repeat regions, the total gene count ranged from 128 to 142 (83-96 protein-coding genes, 37-38 tRNA genes and eight rRNA genes). Variability in total gene number was primarily driven by inverted repeat contraction and expansion and pseudogenization of some genes. ndhF was pseudogenized in seven Daphne species, whereas ndhI and ndhG were pseudogenized in one species each. Two large inversion events were detected, involving 19 and 40 genes, respectively; the first inversion was synapomorphic and provided significant phylogenetic signal. Phylogenetic analysis of shared protein-coding sequences from 74 species (87 individuals) recovered Daphne as a strongly supported monophyletic clade when taxa previously proposed for exclusion from the genus were omitted, whereas Wikstroemia Endl. and Gyrinops Gaertn. exhibited paraphyly. This study expands the cp genome resources for Thymelaeaceae and provides new insights into the structural evolution of cp genome.

Indexed as

DaphneEvolution, MolecularGenome, ChloroplastChloroplastsPhylogenyRNA, TransferRNA, TransferchloroplastDaphneGyrinopsphylogenyThymelaeaceaeWikstroemia

Identifiers

PMID41098041
PMCPMC12955755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.