ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for risk stratification in acute myocarditis across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between early intravenous magnesium sulfate administration and mortality according to systemic immune-inflammation index in critically ill patients with acute heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- High Mobility Group Protein B1 Mediates the Role of the Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Progression of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Combined prediction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and left atrial reservoir strain: A prospective observational study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Post-viral myocarditis.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Myocarditis Prognostic Score: A New Risk Assessment Tool.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- The Role of Inflammation in Takotsubo Syndrome: From Pathogenic Pathways To Imaging Insights and Therapeutic Perspectives.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Editorial-The Lifelong Continuum of Pediatric Cardiovascular Care: New Insights from a Growing Field.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Myocardial inflammation in myocarditis: mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Relation Between Neutrophil Count and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Acute Myocarditis in Adolescents: A Preliminary Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAcute myocarditis (AM) is a heterogeneous clinical condition. Several classification models have been proposed to predict adverse clinical outcomes, but risk stratification remains challenging, particularly for patients presenting with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a useful tool for risk stratification in patients with AM. This study aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of available risk stratification models, including NLR, for identifying patients with AM at increased risk of adverse events. METHODS AND
resultsThe study included 1150 patients with biopsy- or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-proven AM from 10 hospitals in six countries. Baseline clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic and CMR data, and clinical outcomes, were collected. The population was divided into four groups based on published models of high-risk AM (complicated, fulminant, high-risk, and NLR ≥4). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. During a median follow-up of 228 weeks (interquartile range 114-339), 63 events occurred in 60 patients (5.2%) who experienced the primary outcome. NLR (area under the curve [AUC] 0.72) performed similarly to complicated (AUC 0.73) and high-risk definitions (AUC 0.73) for the prediction of adverse events, while the fulminant classification showed significantly inferior predictive accuracy (AUC 0.62, p = 0.02). Moreover, among patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) at presentation, NLR showed superior prognostic value (AUC 0.73; complicated: 0.52, p = 0.001; high-risk: 0.52, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis confirmed that each classification was independently associated with the primary outcome. However, the NLR model showed better predictive performance compared to the other models among patients with LVEF ≥50%.
conclusionsWhile traditional definitions of high-risk AM remain valuable, NLR ≥4 is a simple and cost-effective marker that aids in risk stratification. NLR ≥4 is particularly robust in patients with preserved LVEF, supporting its use across the LVEF spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.