ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Artificial intelligence-based echocardiographic assessment for monitoring disease progression in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07529860 (AI-based Echocardiography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients Undergoing Transthoracic Echocardiography With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AI-based Echocardiography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients Undergoing Transthoracic Echocardiography With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated echocardiographic measurements for longitudinal monitoring of ATTR cardiomyopathy: agreement and repeatability analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Evaluating AL-ISS within a BNP-based model for AL amyloidosis in the daratumumab era.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIn transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), reduced stroke volume (SV) portends a poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables rapid, standardized assessment of left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI), which is a reliable surrogate for SV. We investigated longitudinal changes in AI-derived LVOT-VTI as outcome predictors in ATTR-CM. METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive patients with ATTR-CM underwent baseline and 12 ± 1 month transthoracic echocardiography between 2007 and 2021. Scans were processed by an AI platform for fully automated measurements including LVOT-VTI. Changes in echocardiographic variables were related to all-cause mortality in a landmark analysis using multivariable Cox models adjusting for clinical covariates (age, sex, TTR genotype, atrial fibrillation status, New York Heart Association class and National Amyloidosis Centre stage). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic analysis identified the optimal threshold of LVOT-VTI change. A total of 752 patients (74 ± 9 years; 88% men; 66% wild-type) were followed for a median of 3.3 years (interquartile range 2.1-5.0 years), during which 334 (44.4%) died. Among changes in echocardiographic parameters over 12 months, only LVOT-VTI change remained independently prognostic (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 1% decrease 0.994, p = 0.025). A ≥5% decrease (n = 377 patients, 50%) independently predicted all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.76; p = 0.003), and improved risk reclassification (integrated discrimination improvement = 0.012; continuous net reclassification improvement = 0.21, both p < 0.001).
conclusionsA ≥5% decrease of AI-derived LVOT-VTI over 12 months, a simple indicator of SV loss, is independently associated with worse outcome in ATTR-CM. Routine monitoring of this automated AI metric may guide earlier therapeutic escalation and is a possible endpoint for future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.