Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41097857›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOPi): A Population-Based Study.

Elizabeth Benz, Alexandre Pinel, Christelle Guillet, Frederic Capel, Bruno Pereira, Dimitris Rizopoulos, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Doris Eglseer, Eva Topinkova, Rocco Barazzoni and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOPi).European geriatric medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Sarcopenic Obesity Phenotype Index (SOPi): A Population-Based Study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elizabeth BenzHuman Nutrition Unit, Clermont Auvergne University, Institut National de Recherche Pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4744-2618
Alexandre PinelHuman Nutrition Unit, Clermont Auvergne University, Institut National de Recherche Pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christelle GuilletHuman Nutrition Unit, Clermont Auvergne University, Institut National de Recherche Pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frederic CapelHuman Nutrition Unit, Clermont Auvergne University, Institut National de Recherche Pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraUnit of Biostatistics, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Dimitris RizopoulosDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Alfonso J Cruz-JentoftServicio de Geriatria, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
Doris EglseerInstitute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Eva TopinkovaDepartment of Geriatrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, and University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Rocco BarazzoniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Lorenzo M DoniniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathology, Endocrinology and Human Nutrition, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fernando RivadeneiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marinka SteurDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Trudy VoortmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter J M WeijsDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Josje D SchoufourDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yves BoirieHuman Nutrition Unit, Clermont Auvergne University, Institut National de Recherche Pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

ERA-NET HDHL INTIMIC, Cofund action 727565Erasmus Medical Center and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and DevelopmentEuropean CommissionEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmeFederal Ministry of Education, Science and Research represented by the Austrian Research Promotion AgencyFrench National Research AgencyJPI HDHL PREPHOBESMinistry for Health, Welfare and SportsMinistry of Education, Culture and ScienceMinistry of Education, Youth and Sports Department of Research and Development Czech RepublicMunicipality of RotterdamResearch Institute for Diseases in the ElderlySpanish State Research Agency PCI2020-120683-2the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenic obesity (SO) is a clinical condition defined by the coexistence of high body fat mass and low muscle function and mass, which increases the risk of adverse health outcomes, including disability and mortality. Early detection and frequent monitoring of SO are essential for preventive interventions and management strategies. The current binary approach for SO diagnosis is limited in capturing the spectrum of SO or its progression over time. The main objective of this study was to develop a continuous SOPi that integrates diagnostic criteria such as muscle function and body composition. We aimed to evaluate the association between SOPi and all-cause mortality, to identify baseline-related factors with SOPi and to assess changes in the SOPi over time.

methodsParticipants from the Rotterdam Study with baseline and follow-up measures of handgrip strength (HGS), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-measured appendicular lean mass index (ALM/kg) and body fat percentage (BF%) were included. SOPi was calculated as a sex-specific equation integrating z-scores (Z) of (BF%)-(HGS)-(ALM/kg). Cox regression and multivariable linear regression models were fitted to evaluate mortality risk and associated factors with SOPi, respectively. Subgroup analysis of SOPi changes was performed by linear mixed-effects models.

resultsIn the total population (n = 5888, age 69.5 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.5 ± 4.3 kg/m

conclusionSOPi is a significant predictor of premature death and can identify associated factors, particularly useful among persons at risk of SO. SOPi is higher and increases faster in individuals with specific phenotypes. SOPi integrates prognosis information, which could be used as a risk indicator and for prevention of SO.

Indexed as

ObesitySarcopeniaAgedBody CompositionBody Mass IndexFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeRisk Factorsphenotypepopulation‐based studysarcopeniasarcopenic obesitysurvival

Identifiers

PMID41097857
PMCPMC12528550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.