ReviewPhysiologia plantarum
The Invisible Frontline: High-Tech Root Imaging for Crop Stress Adaptation.
Review in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in root phenotyping: high-throughput imaging, computational tools, and integrative approaches for crop improvement.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Seed biopriming with a novel endophytic Bacillus licheniformis strain RGS enhances drought tolerance and recovery in tomato.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Integrating 3D phenotyping and functional-structural plant models for crop ideotype breeding.Nature communications · 2026Review
- AI-integrated digital breeding for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Waterlogging and hypoxia in plant abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- The Invisible Frontline: High-Tech Root Imaging for Crop Stress Adaptation.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Roots are crucial for enhancing crop resilience to abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, cold, nutrient deficiency, and metal toxicity. Root system architecture and morphological traits play a significant role in enabling plants to access water and nutrients under stress conditions. However, the study of roots is challenging due to their underground nature. Here, we review advancements in high-throughput root phenotyping methodologies that enable the non-destructive and large-scale analysis of root traits in controlled conditions. These include soil-less two-dimensional platforms, such as hydroponics and gel-based systems, and soil-based systems like Rhizotrons and RhizoTubes. Additionally, cutting-edge three-dimensional soil-less systems and soil-based imaging technologies, such as x-ray-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, have significantly improved the precision of root trait analysis. Computational tools, including machine learning algorithms, are also transforming root phenotyping by automating image segmentation, trait extraction, and data analysis. Case studies and examples described here demonstrate the successful application of these methods in identifying stress-specific root traits that improve resilience to various abiotic stresses in monocots, dicots, and legumes. Despite these advancements, challenges such as high costs, scalability, and environmental variability persist. Integrating laboratory and field-based phenotyping systems can address these limitations and lead the way for more effective breeding programs to improve crop resilience against climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.