ReviewProteomics2025
Expanding the Reach of Membrane Protein-Ligand Interaction Studies Through the Integration of Mass Spectrometry and Membrane Mimetics.
Review in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEPTERGENT: A Peptide-Based Reagent for Detergent-Free Extraction of Membrane Proteins and Purification of Membrane Proteomes.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Article
- Expanding the Reach of Membrane Protein-Ligand Interaction Studies Through the Integration of Mass Spectrometry and Membrane Mimetics.Proteomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) offers robust, label-free approaches for characterizing ligand-protein interactions through two main strategies: affinity-based and stability-based assays. However, their application to membrane proteins (MPs)-a major class of drug targets-has been limited by challenges such as structural complexity, low native expression, incomplete trypsin digestion, and poor compatibility with detergent-based MS protocols. Recent progress has advanced the field along two complementary fronts. First, innovations in MS methodology, including native MS, nativeomics, solution-phase thermochemistry, and ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS), have improved the ability to preserve intact assemblies, capture co-bound lipids and ligands, and resolve conformational and energetic landscapes of MPs. Second, advances in MP solubilization and stabilization, through tailored detergent architectures, MS-compatible detergents, and membrane mimetic (MM) systems-such as nanodiscs, peptidiscs, and styrene-maleic acid (SMA) polymers-have created more native-like environments that maintain functional conformations and ligand-binding sites, enabling integration of MPs into high-throughput MS platforms for ligand screening. This review outlines key affinity- and stability-based MS approaches for MPs and highlights how advances in MS methodology and solubilization strategies are extending their scope, positioning MS and MM as an increasingly powerful platform for high-throughput discovery of MP-ligand interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.