ArticlePharmaceutical biology2025
Adjuvant potential of
Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Knowledge of the GenusPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe global rise in bacterial resistance to existing antibiotics has led to increased mortality rates and escalating healthcare costs, underscoring the urgent need for new classes of antibacterial agents that can act synergistically with current antimicrobials.
objectiveThis study aimed to isolate bioactive compounds from MATERIALS AND
methodsThe adjuvant potential of naringenin (N), 5,6-dihydroxy-7,3',4'-trimethoxyflavone (TMF), cilicione-a (Cil), rosmarinic acid (Rs), rosmarinic acid methyl ester (MRs), and fulgidic acid was evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of selected antibiotics in presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of these compounds. The assays were performed against ten bacterial strains using the twofold broth microdilution method. Test samples were prepared in 96-well microtiter plates, incubated at 37 °C for 18 h, and dimethyl sulfoxide was used as the solvent control.
resultsN, Rs, and MRs reduced the MIC value of GEN from 0.78 µM to 0.097 µM against the drug-resistant DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of such combinations to enhance antibiotic efficacy, lower the required dosages, and contribute to mitigating the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.