ReviewCancers2025
Oncolytic Virus Therapies in Malignant Gliomas: Advances and Clinical Trials.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian-guided oncolytic virotherapy for glioblastoma.Journal of neurovirology · 2026Review
- Interventions and platforms that direct lymphangiogenesis to restore physiological homeostasis and enhance immunoregulation.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and therapeutic resistance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Advances and Future Expectations in Oncolytic Virus Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Review
- Reshaping the immunosuppressive glioma microenvironment: mechanisms, biomarkers, and emerging immunotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Oncolytic Viruses in Glioblastoma: Clinical Progress, Mechanistic Insights, and Future Therapeutic Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The overall survival rate of brain malignancies such as glioblastoma is currently a little under two years, at most, and treatment options for malignant brain tumors have demonstrated limited efficacy. The current standard of care to treat brain cancer includes surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. Historically, an observed interaction between malignancies and concurrent viral infection has shown therapeutic potential that can perhaps be better leveraged in brain cancer with the technological advances that we have today. We aim to discuss a variety of viral vector designs to harness their oncolytic potential and explore how some of these ideas have performed in clinical trials. In our review, three major viral candidates that have gained traction in this field of research-Herpes simplex virus-1, adenovirus, and poliovirus-are highlighted. How the field has manipulated aspects of their virology and combined these viral platforms with other immune modulating strategies to treat both adult and pediatric tumors is also surveyed. Finally, the work exploring the possibility of other neurotropic viral candidates has been elaborated. More insight into the biological interactions between tumor, brain, and body is needed to address this particularly difficult clinical challenge. While there is still no clear, effective treatment for brain malignancies, the utilization of oncolytic viruses shows potential both as a treatment and as a tool to better understand the immune microenvironment of this pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.