Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41097695›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Current Insights of Post-Infusion CAR T Expansion and Persistence for Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Grace Wolyncewicz, Rebecca Wayte, Edward Abadir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace WolyncewiczInstitute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Rebecca WayteDepartment of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Edward AbadirInstitute of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is standard of care for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. CAR T-cell persistence and activity are associated with outcomes for patients with relapsed B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL), but the association between expansion kinetics and outcome is less clear in the setting of large B-cell lymphoma. CAR T-cell expansion and persistence have been measured in both clinical trials and real-world settings, but the clinical relevance and applicability of these measurements remain unclear. There is increasing evidence that the in vivo kinetics of CAR T-cells post-infusion do offer important predictive insights into patient outcomes; despite this, limitations remain given the heterogeneity in methodology and timing of measurement. This review will summarise methodologies utilised to measure CD19 directed CAR T-cell expansion and persistence in vivo, in addition to the clinical implications of these measurements as currently described.

Indexed as

CAR Tefficacyexpansionlarge cell lymphomalymphomapersistencetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41097695
PMCPMC12523718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.