ArticleCancers2025
Discordance Between p16-Expression and HPV-Status in Sinonasal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a well-established risk factor for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), where p16 immunohistochemistry serves as a surrogate marker. However, the role of HPV in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) remains less defined, and the reliability of p16 as a standalone surrogate is under debate. This study aimed to assess the concordance between p16 expression and HPV-DNA status in SNSCC and characterize clinicopathologic features in HPV-associated cases.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 111 SNSCC cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2024 at two German centers. p16 status was determined by immunohistochemistry using site-specific antibody protocols. HPV-DNA testing and genotyping were performed via PCR and reverse hybridization. Clinical and histopathological data were collected and compared between HPV-positive and -negative tumors.
resultsHPV-DNA was detected in 31/111 cases (27.9%), with HPV16 and HPV33 (Site A) and HPV 16 and HPV18 (Site B) being the most frequent subtypes. Discordance between p16 and HPV-DNA status was observed in 29.7% of cases, with site-specific discordance rates of 44.6% and 14.5%. Patients with HPV-positive tumors were younger than their HPV-negative counterparts.
conclusionsOur findings underscore the limitations of p16 as a single surrogate marker for detecting HPV-associated sinonasal cancer. Future research on the role of HPV in sinonasal cancer should integrate complementary testing methods (like p16Ink4A immunohistochemistry and HPV DNA/mRNA analysis) and aim for test standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.