ReviewCancers2025
Understanding and Exacerbating the Biological Response of Uveal Melanoma to Proton Beam Therapy.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inhibition of ATM, ATR and DNA-PK radiosensitises 3D uveal melanoma models to X-rays and proton beam therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, associated with a high tendency for metastasis to the liver. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is the preferred external radiotherapy treatment for primary UM of certain sizes and locations in the eye, due to its efficacy and good local tumour control, as well as its precision to spare surrounding ocular structures. PBT is an effective alternative to surgical enucleation and other non-precision-targeted radiotherapies. Despite this, the radiobiology of UM in response to PBT is still not fully understood. This enhanced knowledge would help to further optimise UM treatment and improve patient outcomes through reducing radiation dosage to ocular structures, treating larger tumours that would otherwise require enucleation, or even offering a treatment strategy for the otherwise fatal liver metastases. In this review, we explore current knowledge of the treatment of UM with PBT, evaluating the biological responses to the therapy. Molecular factors, such as tumour size, oxygen tension levels, DNA damage proficiency, and autophagy, are known to influence the cellular response to radiotherapy, and these will be discussed. Furthermore, we examine innovative strategies to enhance radiotherapy outcomes, such as combination therapies with DNA damage repair and autophagy modulators, as well as advancements in PBT planning and delivery. By integrating current research and emerging technologies, we aim to provide opportunities to improve the therapeutic effectiveness of PBT in UM management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.