ArticleCancers2025
Interaction Between Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Tumor Cells Present in Cervical Cancer Influences Macrophage Polarization.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in cervical cancer: Bidirectional mechanisms and research progress (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Enhanced sialylation of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells contributes to immune remodeling through macrophage polarization in multiple myeloma patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMacrophages with the M2 phenotype are an immune population with great relevance for tumor development. We have previously demonstrated that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from cervical cancer (CeCa-MSCs) enhance the immunomodulatory activity of CeCa cells on T lymphocytes; however, the effect of these cells on the ability of tumor cells to polarize macrophages had not been evaluated to date.
methodsTo address this, we set out to analyze the effect of normal cervix (NCx) and CeCa-MSCs interacting with CeCa tumor cells (TCs) to polarize macrophages in a coculture system.
resultsOur results show that macrophages from TC/NCx-MSC cocultures decreased CD163 expression. In turn, we observed that macrophages from TC/CeCa-MSC cocultures, in contrast to those in the presence of TCs/NCx-MSCs, increased the intracellular production of IDO, IL-4, and IL-10; decreased T lymphocyte proliferation; and increased the presence of soluble IL-10. Interestingly, coculture in the presence of TCs/NCx-MSCs decreased the capacity of macrophages to generate regulatory T lymphocyte populations, as well as their phagocytic capacity, and increased IL-6 secretion, unlike the coculture of macrophages in the presence of TCs/CeCa-MSCs. Our results show that TCs/CeCa-MSCs in cocultures, unlike TCs/NCx-MSCs, have a greater capacity to polarize macrophages to an M2 phenotype and that such macrophages have a greater immunosuppressive potential.
conclusionsThis in vitro study suggests that intracellular communication between MSCs and tumor cells in CeCa may promote tumor growth through the polarization of macrophages with increased immunosuppressive activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.