ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ultrasound Thawing Optimization as a Novel Strategy to Improve Quality of Slowly Frozen Chicken Breast.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Intelligent Thawing Systems for Protein-Based Foods: An Industry 5.0 Perspective.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Ultrasonic cavitation in food processing.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Review
- Effect of Different Thawing Methods on the Quality and Antioxidant Activity of FrozenFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Thawing Enhances Myofibrillar Protein Integrity and Quality Attributes of Common Carp (Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- The Influence of Different Ultrasonication Parameters on Physicochemical Properties and Secoiridoid Compositions of Olive Extracts: A Mathematical Approach Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Modification of Muscle Proteins Induced by Novel Non-Thermal Processing: Theory, Characterization, and Consequences.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chicken meat is highly consumed worldwide due to its nutritional value, but its high water content and abundance of polyunsaturated fatty acids make it particularly vulnerable to structural and oxidative damage during freezing and thawing. Slow freezing, in particular, generates large ice crystals that severely impair water-holding capacity (WHC), increase drip loss, promote color deterioration, and intensify protein and lipid oxidation. Innovative thawing strategies are therefore required to mitigate these quality losses. Ultrasound (US) has been successfully applied to accelerate thawing of fast-frozen meat; however, its potential for slowly frozen chicken breast remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of US-assisted thawing at two frequencies (25 and 130 kHz), two amplitudes (100% and 60%), and three operating modes (normal, sweep, and degas) on the quality of slowly frozen chicken breast. Conventional thawing required 50 min, yielding WHC of 9.87%, drip loss of 4.65%, free sulfhydryls of 16.38 µmol/g, and ∆E of 3.91. In contrast, the optimized US condition (25 kHz, 100% amplitude, sweep mode) thawed samples in only 18 min, with markedly improved WHC (23.14%), reduced drip loss (3.25%), higher preservation of free sulfhydryls (24.69 µmol/g), and minimal color change (∆E = 3.72). Conversely, less effective parameters (e.g., 130 kHz, 60% amplitude, normal mode) prolonged thawing and compromised quality, with WHC dropping to 9.96% and drip loss increasing to 9.05%. Overall, US reduced thawing time under all conditions, but quality responses depended strongly on the applied parameters. The present findings demonstrate the novelty of optimizing US frequency, amplitude, and mode for thawing slowly frozen chicken breast, highlighting sweep mode at 25 kHz and 100% amplitude as the most effective strategy. Future research should explore its scalability and industrial applicability for poultry processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.