ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Optimization of Calibration Strategies for the Quantification of Volatile Compounds in Virgin Olive Oil.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venlafaxine Removal from Water and Wastewater Using Activated Carbons from Spent Brewery Grains Produced by Conventional vs. Microwave Pyrolysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quantification of volatile compounds in virgin olive oil poses several analytical challenges due to the existence of different concentrations, chemical families, and the possible matrix effect. Accurate quantification, using adequate methodological calibration and statistical procedures, is essential for obtaining reliable results. The aim of this work was to develop and validate an analytical-statistical approach for the quantification of volatile compounds in virgin olive oil. Therefore, several analytical parameters were determined for four calibrations. The ordinary least square (OLS) linear adjustment was selected over the weighted least square due to the homoscedasticity of the variable errors. Additionally, standard addition (AC) and AC with an internal standard (IS) exhibited greater variability, whereas external matrix-matched calibration (EC) was identified as the most reliable approach for quantifying volatile compounds in virgin olive oil. The employment of an IS did not improve the performance of the method in any case. Thus, based on the statistical results, the OLS linear adjustment with EC was selected as the best statistical-analytical approach for quantifying volatiles in olive oil matrices. The volatiles of nine virgin olive oil samples were quantified, applying different methodological calibrations, and no differences were detected, underscoring EC as a superior alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.