Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41097582›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Matrix Interference of Vegetable on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Parathion Residue Detection.

Linglong Chen, Ge Chen, Xing Zhang, Qinghuan Wu, Guangyang Liu, Xiaomin Xu, Yanguo Zhang, Lingyun Li, Lin Qin, Jing Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linglong ChenInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Ge ChenInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-9668
Xing ZhangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Qinghuan WuInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Guangyang LiuInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-2197
Xiaomin XuInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Yanguo ZhangInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Lingyun LiInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Lin QinInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.
Jing WangInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Quality and Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100081, China.
Maojun JinInstitute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Product Quality and Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9102-8572
Donghui XuInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Ministry of Agriculture Vegetable Product Quality Safety Risk Assessment Laboratory, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund No. IVF-BRF2024013, Y2023LM10National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFD2000603The National Natural Science Foundation of China 32302207,32402242The Special Fund for the Industrial System Construction of Modern Agriculture of China CARS-23-E03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex matrix of vegetable severely interferes with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) accuracy, limiting its application in parathion residue detection. This study investigated the interference mechanism of vegetable matrix, including chlorophyll, perilla protein, glucose, fructose, and sucrose, on ELISA. Furthermore, we validated the vegetable matrix interference on parathion residue ELISA by comparing the matrix interference index (I

Indexed as

immunoassaymatrix interferenceparathion residuesrapid detectionvegetable

Identifiers

PMID41097582
PMCPMC12524109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.