ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emulsification Properties of Plant and Milk Protein Concentrate Blends.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Influence of pH-Driven Interaction Between Soy Protein Isolate and Soy Isoflavones on the Structural and Functional Properties of Their Complexes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blending is a promising strategy during the partial replacement of plant with animal proteins. This, however, may lead to alteration in the technofunctional properties of the resultant blends. In this study, partial replacement of milk protein concentrate (MPC) with different plant proteins including soy, rice and pea protein concentrates (SPC, RPC and PPC, respectively) was conducted to determine the effect of blending at different ratios on the technofunctional properties relevant to their emulsification behavior, e.g., emulsion stability, viscosity and water holding capacity (WHC) and oil binding capacity (OBC). It was observed that at equivalent concentrations, the plant protein concentrates had higher apparent viscosities compared to MPC and the blends. RPC-MPC, at all ratios (25:75, 50:50, and 75:25), had a lower OBC when compared with the SPC-MPC and PPC-MPC blends. The lowest OBC was 32.5, for RCP-MPC 25:75, and the highest was 116.0 for SPC-MPC 25:75. The highest solubility of PPC, RPC, and SPC was observed in their blend form at 50:50 (73.2%), 75:25 (86.5%) and 25:75 (71.1%) ratios, respectively. Plant protein-MPC blends showed higher emulsion stability than the individual plant protein concentrates. The highest emulsion stability was 100%, for RPC-MPC 50:50 and 75:25 ratios, PPC-MPC at 50:50 ratio, and SPC-MPC at 25:75 and 100:0 ratios. Among the blends, SPC-MPC 25:75, PPC-MPC 50:50 and RPC-MPC 50:50 showed the most suitable overall emulsification properties. Based on the results, blending MPC with plant protein concentrates led to promising improvements in emulsification behavior relevant to different composite protein ingredient applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.