ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Predicting Temporal Liking of Food Pairings from Temporal Dominance of Sensations Data via Reservoir Computing on Crackers and Spreads.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and temporal liking (TL) methods offer complementary insights into the evolution of sensory and hedonic responses during food consumption. This study investigates the feasibility of predicting TL curves for food pairings from their TDS profiles using reservoir computing, a type of recurrent neural network. Participants evaluated eight samples-two crackers (plain, sesame), two spreads (peanut butter, strawberry jam), and their four binary combinations-performing both TDS and TL evaluations. This process yielded paired time-series data of TDS and TL curves. We trained various reservoir models under different conditions, including varying reservoir sizes (64, 128, 192, or 256 neurons) and the inclusion of auxiliary input dimensions, such as flags indicating the types of foods tasted. Our results show that models with minimal auxiliary inputs achieved the lowest root mean squared errors (RMSEs), with the best performance being an RMSE of 0.44 points on a 9-point liking scale between the observed and predicted TL curves. The ability to predict TL curves for food pairings holds some promise for reducing the need for extensive sensory evaluation, especially when a large number of food combinations are targeted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.