Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41097494›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Chinese and Korean Consumers' Preferences for Oolong and Black Oolong Teas.

Baihan Su, Jeehyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baihan SuDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition & Kimchi Research Institute, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0002-6317-6532
Jeehyun LeeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition & Kimchi Research Institute, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-7531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both China and Korea have significant markets for tea; however, both the availability and preference for oolong and black oolong tea vary across the two markets. Although this difference has been highlighted in previous studies, the group differences in the two markets based on preferences and sensory perceptions have not been assessed. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the overall oolong and black oolong tea preferences based on specific characteristics of the tea samples and the sensory perceptions of young Chinese and Korean consumers residing in South Korea. Twelve tea samples were selected for on-site evaluations. A Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) method with 20 sensory characteristics was used to identify the sensory characteristics perceived, supplemented by intensity ratings for key attributes. The CATA-Penalty analysis revealed sensory characteristics that significantly impacted overall liking. The results indicated that while Chinese and South Korean consumers exhibited some differences in overall preference trends, they shared similar preferences within specific tea categories. This reflects differences in preferences between Chinese and South Korean consumers for oolong and black oolong tea beverages and the possible impact of different cultural backgrounds on consumption habits. These findings provide insights into cross-cultural sensory preferences and the impact of the cultural background on tea beverage perception.

Indexed as

CATA-Penaltyconsumption habitscross-cultural comparison

Identifiers

PMID41097494
PMCPMC12524054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.