ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Establishment of a Sheep Embryo Genomic Selection System.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embryo genomic selection (EGS) is a contemporary breeding strategy that combines genomic selection (GS) methodology with embryo biotechnology. By conducting genotyping and genomic prediction at the pre-implantation stage, embryos with superior breeding value can be identified for transfer, markedly increasing breeding efficiency while reducing the uncertainty and temporal expenditure associated with conventional GS. This study establishes a reliable embryo biopsy-based GS pipeline for sheep, incorporating optimized whole-genome amplification and microcell genotyping techniques. We developed a high-efficiency in vitro sheep embryo production platform compatible with embryo biopsy. Systematic comparison of Multiple Displacement Amplification (MDA) and Multiple Annealing and Looping Based Amplification Cycles (MALBAC) whole-genome amplification systems yielded high-quality genotypes from biopsy samples of embryos containing as few as 10 cells. Imputation using 10× whole-genome sequencing data significantly increased both genotype call rates and accuracy. High concordance was observed between embryo and lamb genotypes, and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for key growth traits exhibited strong correlations (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.