ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Unveiled: Bridging Science, Treatment Strategy, and Economic Aspects.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticancer activity of lichen-derived compounds against triple-negative breast cancer: integrated in vitro evaluation, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and KEGG pathway analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Developing a Phosphodiesterase 10A Inhibitor as a Novel Therapeutic Agent for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cells · 2026Article
- Advancements in Immune Checkpoint-Based Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- SPDEF downregulation promotes tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Genetic Correlation of miR-423 Polymorphism rs8067576 with Progression and Prognosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer: current understanding and future perspectives.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has historically been challenging to treat due to limited therapeutic options. Since 2018, the treatment landscape has evolved substantially with the approval of precision therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Despite these advancements, the therapeutic benefit remains limited due to various clinical challenges, largely driven by TNBC heterogeneity and an incomplete understanding of drug-tumor crosstalk mechanisms-both contributing to a restricted pool of eligible patients and variable treatment responses. Concurrently, emerging drugs tested in recent pivotal TNBC trials have demonstrated variable outcomes. Additionally, the associated economic burden has become a pressing global concern, as several approved drugs provide insufficient clinical benefit in relation to high expenditures, often driven by drug pricing. The situation is particularly critical in low- and middle-income countries, where TNBC is highly prevalent, yet access to even chemotherapeutic treatment remains limited. These factors collectively hinder real-world patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of TNBC management, integrating clinical advancements with economic perspectives and raising awareness of underdiscussed topics. The overview presented herein highlights the necessity for a global, interdisciplinary approach and patient centered care in TNBC drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.