ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Time-Lapse Imaging in IVF: Bridging the Gap Between Promises and Clinical Realities.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Static to Dynamic: Fluorescence Imaging Technology Advances Precise Embryo Evaluation.Small methods · 2026Review
- Contemporary Approaches Towards the Optimization of Embryo Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Impact of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Embryonic Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Narrative Review.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Non-invasive biomarkers in assisted reproductive technologies, current evidence, clinical utility and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies: evaluating efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes in female infertility.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Review
- Non-Invasive Extracellular Vesicle Biomarkers in Endometriosis, Molecular Signatures Linking Pelvic Inflammation, Oocyte Quality, and IVF OutcomesCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-lapse imaging (TLI) has emerged as a transformative technology in in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is because it offers continuous, non-invasive embryo assessment through morphokinetic profiling. It demonstrates key advantages such as reduced embryologist subjectivity, detection of dynamic anomalies, and improved implantation rates in niche populations. However, its clinical utility remains debated. Large trials and meta-analyses reveal no universal improvement in live birth rates compared to conventional methods. Key challenges underlying the outcome include algorithm generalizability, lab-specific protocol variability, and high costs. Nevertheless, TLI shows promise in specific contexts. For instance, Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles where it reduces unnecessary biopsies by predicting euploidy. However, even in this, its benefits are marginal in unselected populations. This review synthesizes evidence to highlight that TLI's value is context-dependent, not universal. As such, adoption must be cautious to avoid resource misallocation without significant IVF outcome improvements. In future, personalized protocols, integration with non-invasive biomarkers, and multicenter collaboration are crucial to optimize TLI's potential in assisted reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.