Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Comparative Analysis of CT and MRI Combined with RNA Sequencing for Radiogenomic Staging of Bladder Cancer.

Joshua Levy, Toru Sakatani, Kaoru Murakami, Yuki Kita, Takashi Kobayashi, Susan Win, Saro Manoukian, Charles J Rosser, Hideki Furuya

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joshua LevySamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-1291
Toru SakataniDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kaoru MurakamiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4226-3867
Yuki KitaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-2816
Susan WinDepartment of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Saro ManoukianDepartment of Radiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Charles J RosserSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6052-4223
Hideki FuruyaSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9536-8662

Funding

Cedars-Sinai Cancer Developmental Funds for Investigator-Initiated Trials Using Advanced Imaging Methods
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate staging of bladder cancer (BCa) is important for identifying optimal treatment. Currently, clinical tumor staging for BCa relies on computed tomography (CT) scans, but these can lead to under- or overstaging of patients. Recent research suggests that using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along with RNA sequencing (RNASeq) gene expression analysis can provide more precise staging. In this study, 31 matched CT scans, MRI images, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues were collected. First, two radiologists reviewed the images for staging BCa. Next, radiomics features were extracted from both CT and MR images, and computational radiogenomics analyses were performed. Subsequently, RNASeq was performed using FFPE tissues of TURBT prior to cystectomy. A radiogenomic analysis was conducted to identify advanced T-stage signatures. Regarding imaging alone, MRI was found to be more accurate in staging >T2 compared to CT scans. Within a retrospective cohort, MRI radiogenomic signatures were more effective in staging patients than CT, with genomic features playing a significant role. Using canonical correlation analysis, we additionally identified radiomic features underlying genomic signatures of advanced tumor stage. When applying these signatures across a small prospective cohort, MRI radiomic data were able to stratify stage; however, the addition of the same genomic features did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of the model. These preliminary results are promising, but additional research with larger sample sizes is needed to draw definitive conclusions and explore further correlations and statistical interactions between genes and imaging features through machine learning techniques as we move radiogenomics to the clinic.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSequence Analysis, RNATomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceCTMRImuscle-invasive bladder cancerradiogenomicsRNASeq

Identifiers

PMID41096834
PMCPMC12524899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.