ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Comparative Analysis of CT and MRI Combined with RNA Sequencing for Radiogenomic Staging of Bladder Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes".Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- The "perfect storm" in bladder oncology: a case of diverticular carcinoma with plasmacytoid features and its clinical ramifications.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Review
- Radiogenomic landscape of the hallmarks of cancer.Biomarker research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate staging of bladder cancer (BCa) is important for identifying optimal treatment. Currently, clinical tumor staging for BCa relies on computed tomography (CT) scans, but these can lead to under- or overstaging of patients. Recent research suggests that using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along with RNA sequencing (RNASeq) gene expression analysis can provide more precise staging. In this study, 31 matched CT scans, MRI images, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues were collected. First, two radiologists reviewed the images for staging BCa. Next, radiomics features were extracted from both CT and MR images, and computational radiogenomics analyses were performed. Subsequently, RNASeq was performed using FFPE tissues of TURBT prior to cystectomy. A radiogenomic analysis was conducted to identify advanced T-stage signatures. Regarding imaging alone, MRI was found to be more accurate in staging >T2 compared to CT scans. Within a retrospective cohort, MRI radiogenomic signatures were more effective in staging patients than CT, with genomic features playing a significant role. Using canonical correlation analysis, we additionally identified radiomic features underlying genomic signatures of advanced tumor stage. When applying these signatures across a small prospective cohort, MRI radiomic data were able to stratify stage; however, the addition of the same genomic features did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of the model. These preliminary results are promising, but additional research with larger sample sizes is needed to draw definitive conclusions and explore further correlations and statistical interactions between genes and imaging features through machine learning techniques as we move radiogenomics to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.