Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096787›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Spaceflight and Ground-Based Microgravity Simulation Impact on Cognition and Brain Plasticity.

Jiaqi Hao, Jun Chang, Yulin Deng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiaqi HaoSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100811, China.
Jun ChangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100811, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8048-1956
Yulin DengSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100811, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-4052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microgravity exposure during spaceflight has been linked to cognitive impairments, including deficits in attention, executive function, and spatial memory. Both space missions and ground-based analogs-such as head-down bed rest, dry immersion, and hindlimb unloading-consistently demonstrate that altered gravity disrupts brain structure and neural plasticity. Neuroimaging data reveal significant changes in brain morphology, functional connectivity, and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. At the cellular level, simulated microgravity impairs synaptic plasticity, alters dendritic spine architecture, and compromises neurotransmitter release. These changes are accompanied by dysregulation of neuroendocrine signaling, decreased expression of neurotrophic factors, and activation of oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory pathways. Molecular and omics-level analyses further point to mitochondrial dysfunction and disruptions in key signaling cascades governing synaptic integrity, energy metabolism, and neuronal survival. Despite these advances, discrepancies across studies-due to differences in models, durations, and endpoints-limit mechanistic clarity and translational relevance. Human data remain scarce, emphasizing the need for standardized, longitudinal, and multimodal investigations. This review provides an integrated synthesis of current evidence on the cognitive and neurobiological effects of microgravity, spanning behavioral, structural, cellular, and molecular domains. By identifying consistent patterns and unresolved questions, we highlight critical targets for future research and the development of effective neuroprotective strategies for long-duration space missions.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionNeuronal PlasticitySpace FlightWeightlessnessWeightlessness SimulationAnimalsHumanscognitive functionmicrogravityneural plasticityneuroimagingspaceflight analog modelssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41096787
PMCPMC12524882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.