Evaluation of Potential Molecular Targets of the Alkaloid Epiisopiloturine, Involved in Cardioprotective Effects, Using Computational Molecular Docking in an Animal Model of Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Potential molecular targets on which methylene blue acts to promote its effects on cardiac electrophysiology, myocardial injury, and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats submitted to cardiac ischemia and reperfusion.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as