SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Exploring the Diagnostic and Predictive Value of Oral Microbiome in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Microbiota and Clinical Outcomes in Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Early esophageal squamous neoplasia and the microbiome: evidence, mechanisms, and early-detection potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The research interest in the oral microbiome's role in esophageal cancer is growing, yet a comprehensive synthesis of available evidence is still lacking. This study aimed to explore the effects of oral microbiome on the development of esophageal cancer through a systematic review of existing literature retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Eighteen studies published between 2015 and 2024 were obtained, involving 1191 cases and 1403 controls, mostly using oral saliva samples and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Findings on alpha-diversity were inconsistent, while most studies reported significant beta-diversity differences between cases and controls. Notably, several investigations on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma showed higher levels of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.