ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Molecular Dynamics Simulation Reveals the Mechanism of Substrate Recognition by Lignin-Degrading Enzymes.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lignin, the most abundant aromatic biopolymer, represents a key renewable feedstock for sustainable biorefineries, yet its structural complexity poses a formidable challenge for enzymatic degradation. While ligninolytic enzymes such as laccases (LACs), lignin peroxidases (LiPs), and manganese peroxidases (MnPs) exhibit remarkable catalytic versatility, the molecular mechanisms underlying their ability to balance substrate specificity and structural flexibility remain unresolved. Here, we employed all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and virtual mutagenesis to dissect the dynamic interactions between these enzymes and lignin model compound (β-O-4-linked H-type dimers). Our simulations revealed a dual recognition mechanism in which polar residues (such as Asp, Glu, Arg and His) formed hydrogen bonds with hydroxyl and keto groups near catalytic cleavage sites, ensuring precise alignment for bond scission, while aromatic residues stabilized diverse lignin conformations via hydrophobic interactions with conserved aromatic rings. Conformational dynamics of active-site residues enabled adaptive adjustments to substrate heterogeneity, reconciling enzymatic specificity with structural promiscuity. Virtual mutation experiments further demonstrated that aromatic residues were indispensable for binding stability, whereas polar residues dictated cleavage-site selectivity. These findings provide atomic-scale insights into the catalytic mechanism of ligninolytic enzymes, with implications in the rational design of superior biocatalyst for lignin biorefineries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.