ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Biomarkers for Personalised Primary or Secondary Prevention in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Rapid Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic 2.0: Redefining Cardiovascular Prevention Through SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nitric Oxide Signaling in Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathology: Mechanisms, Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Early detection and personalised prevention strategies are crucial for reducing the burden of CVD. The use of biomarkers plays a pivotal role in identifying individuals at risk and facilitating timely interventions. This rapid scoping review aims to identify and evaluate current research on biomarkers used for primary and secondary personalised prevention of CVD, highlighting evidence gaps and the integration of digital technologies. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline and Embase databases from January 2020 to February 2023. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. A total of 775 studies were included, with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke being the most investigated CVDs. Molecular, cellular, imaging, physiological, and anthropometric biomarkers were included. Molecular biomarkers, particularly genetic and biochemical, were the most researched. For secondary prevention, there was considerable research using imaging biomarkers. Genetic biomarker research was the most frequent category of biomarker identified, particularly using variant analysis and polygenic scores, followed by biochemical, imaging, and physiological biomarkers. There was also evidence of the integration of artificial intelligence to enhance the predictive capabilities of these biomarkers. Despite progress, research gaps were identified for less common CVDs, such as aortic aneurysm and nonrheumatic valvular heart disease, and limited research investigating other molecular biomarker types, such as epigenetics and transcriptomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.