Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096563›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Genome Editing by Grafting.

Samuel Simoni, Marco Fambrini, Claudio Pugliesi, Ugo Rogo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel SimoniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto, 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy.
Marco FambriniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto, 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-3954
Claudio PugliesiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto, 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-7947
Ugo RogoDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto, 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-0819-7054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grafting is the process of joining parts of two plants, allowing the exchange of molecules such as small RNAs (including microRNAs and small interfering RNAs), messenger RNAs, and proteins between the rootstock and the scion. Genome editing by grafting exploits RNAs, such as tRNA-like sequences (TLS motifs), to deliver the components (RNA) of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system from transgenic rootstock to wild-type scion. The complex Cas9 protein and sgRNA-TLS produced in the scion perform the desired modification without the integration of foreign DNA in the plant genome, resulting in heritable transgene-free genome editing. In this review, we examine the current state of the art of this innovation and how it helps address regulatory problems, improves crop recovery and selection, exceeds the usage of viral vectors, and may reduce potential off-target effects. We also discuss the promise of genome editing by grafting for plants recalcitrant to in vitro culture and for agamic-propagated species that must maintain heterozygosity for plant productivity, fruit quality, and adaptation. Furthermore, we explore the limitations of this technique, including variable efficiency, graft incompatibility among genotypes, and challenges in large-scale application, while highlighting its considerable potential for further improvement and future broader applications for crop breeding.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR/Casgenome editinggraftingmobile RNAtransgene-free plantstRNA-like sequences

Identifiers

PMID41096563
PMCPMC12524868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.