Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096510›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

A Review of Assessment of Sow Pain During Farrowing Using Grimace Scores.

Lucy Palmer, Sabrina Lomax, Roslyn Bathgate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy PalmerSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Sabrina LomaxSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6417-5788
Roslyn BathgateSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7922-5610

Funding

Australian Pork (Australia) 2025/0122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproduction is one of the most important considerations for the livestock industry, presenting significant economic and animal health and welfare pressures for producers. Parturition, the process of giving birth, is known to be highly painful in many mammalian species, but the understanding of parturient pain in sows is limited. Farrowing, the process of parturition in pigs, is understudied compared to other livestock species, with very little research available specifically regarding pain. Pain can be detrimental to animal wellbeing; hence, it is vital for it to be reliably detected and managed in such a way that improves both sow and piglet health and welfare. Grimace scales have been developed as a method for pain detection and quantification in animals via observations of facial expression changes in response to painful stimuli. This presents a unique opportunity for improved pain assessment during farrowing, increasing the current understanding of farrowing dynamics and potentially enhancing farrowing management decisions to prioritise sow welfare. This review synthesises and critically analyses the current knowledge on sow parturient pain and the ability for the application of facial grimace scoring to measure pain severity. Grimace scoring was found to be an effective, simple and feasible method of pain assessment in a number of domestic species, and its recent application to farrowing is a promising development in the understanding and management of sow welfare during parturition.

Indexed as

dystociafacial expressionparturitionpigwelfare

Identifiers

PMID41096510
PMCPMC12523877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.