Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096499›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Technical Note: Assessment of a Novel Method to Measure Water Intake in Beef Cattle and Its Application to Determining Dry Matter Intake.

Hartley J VanGilder, Nathan E Blake, Tylor J Yost, K E ArunKumar, Matthew Walker, Ida Holásková, Jarred W Yates, Matthew E Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hartley J VanGilderSchool of Agriculture and Food Systems, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division of Land Grant Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Nathan E BlakeSchool of Agriculture and Food Systems, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division of Land Grant Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6928-0570
Tylor J YostSchool of Agriculture and Food Systems, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division of Land Grant Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
K E ArunKumarSchool of Agriculture and Food Systems, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division of Land Grant Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Matthew WalkerWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Ida HoláskováWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Jarred W YatesWest Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Matthew E WilsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Systems, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division of Land Grant Engagement, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-6358

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1024859National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1025826USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 68-3D47-15-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the efficiency, economic viability, and environmental sustainability of beef cattle production requires tools to identify resource-efficient animals. Validated tools to measure, monitor, and verify individual feed and water intake are needed. Here, we verify the validity of the Vytelle In-Pen Weighing Position to passively collect daily full body weights and assess the use of an integrated flow meter with a commercial waterer as a tool to measure daily water intake. This study involved 103 bulls (40 Charolais and 63 Angus) and 54 heifers (25 Charolais and 29 Angus). These animals were fed in a facility with feed intake nodes, In-Pen Weighing, and metered waterers. Body weights collected on the chute scale and total water usage measured by a residential water meter were used to evaluate body weight and water intake measured at the In-Pen Weighing Positions. We confirmed that In-Pen Weighing is highly correlated to chute weighing (Spearman's correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.99,

Indexed as

beef cattlefeed intakemachine learningwater intake

Identifiers

PMID41096499
PMCPMC12523321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.