Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096488›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Mixed Management in Growing and Finishing Pigs: Impacts on Social Behavior and Judgment Bias.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Leandro Batista Costa, Saulo Henrique Weber, Antoni Dalmau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de OliveiraGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.
Leandro Batista CostaGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-4860
Saulo Henrique WeberGraduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7584-8044
Antoni DalmauInstitut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries-IRTA, Porcine Control and Evaluation, 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-6796

Funding

Spanish Program of Research (MICYN) AGL2017-88849-R.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive pig production practices may shape cognition and behavior. We evaluated whether repeated regrouping (mixing) and gender (gilts vs. barrows) affect social interactions, fear-related responses, and affective state. A total of 96 growing pigs were separated into two treatments: control-pigs that were mixed once during the growing-finishing period; and social stress-pigs that were mixed thrice during the growing-finishing period. Social and non-social behaviors were directly noted, and four behavioral tests were conducted: open field, novel object, couples, and judgment bias tests. The statistical analysis compared gender and treatment, and

Indexed as

behavioral testscognitionemotional statepessimistic judgmentsocialization

Identifiers

PMID41096488
PMCPMC12523953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.