ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Preliminary Evaluation of Blending, Tuning, and Scaling Parameters in ssGBLUP for Genomic Prediction Accuracy in South African Holstein Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Adjusted ssGBLUP Models for Genomic Prediction and Matrix Compatibility in South African Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of blending, tuning, and scaling adjustments in ssGBLUP on the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for South African Holstein cattle. The edited dataset included pedigree information for 541,325 animals, 696,413 phenotypic records (milk, protein, and fat yields), and genotypes for 1221 Holstein cattle. The accuracy of GEBVs was evaluated based on different parameter settings for blending (β = 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40), tuning (τ), and scaling (τ and ω), ranging from 0.60 to 1.00. The results show that ssGBLUP outperformed the traditional pedigree-based approach (ABLUP), with realized accuracies increasing from 0.01 to 0.23 for milk yield, 0.03 to 0.29 for protein yield, and 0.03 to 0.30 for fat yield. Blending with β = 0.30-0.40 slightly increased the accuracy, while tuning adjustments showed limited influence on the prediction results. Scaling factors had a significant influence on accuracy, with ω = 0.60 yielding the highest values (0.26 for milk, 0.32 for protein, and 0.34 for fat). The results of this study show the importance of optimizing the integration of pedigree and genomic information in ssGBLUP to improve the accuracy of genomic predictions, ultimately enhancing selection decisions and genetic progress in South African Holstein cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.