Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096430›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Combination of Anti-Mycotoxin Additive in Diet Contaminated with Multiple Mycotoxins (Aflatoxin, Fumonisin, Zearalenone and Deoxynivalenol): Effects on Performance and Health of Lambs.

Suelyn de Oliveira Marques, Guilherme Luiz Deolindo, Andrei Lucas Rebelatto Brunetto, Ana Lara Amaral da Veiga, Renato Santos de Jesus, Eduardo Micotti Da Gloria, Gilnei Bruno da Silva, Margarete Dulce Bagatini, Aleksandro Schafer Da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Contamination of fumonisin in feeds from different regions of China.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Suelyn de Oliveira MarquesDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-3661
Guilherme Luiz DeolindoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-6902
Andrei Lucas Rebelatto BrunettoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5970-7703
Ana Lara Amaral da VeigaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Renato Santos de JesusDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Eduardo Micotti Da GloriaDepartment of Biological Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0544-8632
Gilnei Bruno da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages 88520-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Margarete Dulce BagatiniCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal Fronteira Sul, Chapecó 89812-000, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Aleksandro Schafer Da SilvaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Chapecó 89815-630, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the grain and cereal production process, whether during harvesting, processing, or storage, errors can occur, compromising product quality and potentially leading to contamination by fungi, which produce toxic substances known as mycotoxins. When fed to animals, these contaminated grains and cereals can cause several negative effects on animal health, impacting their production performance, including immunosuppression, hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and reproductive problems. To minimize the problems caused by mycotoxins, anti-mycotoxin additives, also known as adsorbents, are used. These are inert materials that bind to mycotoxins and are excreted in feces, preventing their action within the animal's body. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an anti-mycotoxin product based on bentonite, activated charcoal, milk thistle extract, and yeast cell wall in the diet of mycotoxin-contaminated lambs on animal health and performance. Thirty lambs were divided into three homogeneous groups: control (without mycotoxins or additives), mycotoxin (with mycotoxins), and anti-mycotoxin (mycotoxins and additive). The mycotoxins used for feed contamination were aflatoxin (AFLA) (200 ppb), fumonisin (FUMO) (15 ppm), zearalenone (ZEA) (500 ppb), and deoxynivalenol (DON) (1.5 ppm). The anti-mycotoxin additive was used at a dose of 1 kg/ton of concentrate. Parameters of zootechnical performance, hematological profile, serum biochemistry, and oxidative status were evaluated. The group that ingested the contaminated concentrate with mycotoxin had a lower average daily weight gain (ADG) when compared to the control and anti-mycotoxin groups. Ingestion of a mycotoxin-contaminated diet increased the activity of aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase, which are indicators of liver damage. However, when the anti-mycotoxin additive was used, the increase in these enzymes was modest and lower than in the mycotoxin group. Ingestion of a mycotoxin-containing concentrate increased levels of oxidative stress biomarkers such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and reduced glutathione (GST), demonstrating that the mycotoxin challenge was effective in causing oxidative stress. However, when the diet was contaminated with mycotoxins and supplemented with the anti-mycotoxin additive, the levels of ROS and TBARS were similar to those of the negative control group. We concluded that adding the anti-mycotoxin product to the lambs' diets prevented or minimized the problems caused by mycotoxin consumption, allowing these lambs to have ADG, and feed efficiency similar to the control group.

Indexed as

liver injurymycotoxinsoxidative damagesheep farming

Identifiers

PMID41096430
PMCPMC12523754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.