ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Farm-Specific Effects in Predicting Mastitis by Applying Machine Learning Models to Automated Milking System and Other Farm Management Data.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling the Adaptation of Dairy Cows to Automatic Milking Systems Using Statistical Methods and Machine Learning: Development of the Robotic Adaptability Index.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and accurate prediction of mastitis is crucial in effective herd management and minimizing economic losses. This study investigated the effects of farm-specific factors on the accuracy of mastitis predictions by applying machine learning (ML) models to an automated milking system (AMS) and farm management data. We analyzed a large dataset consisting of 5.88 million observations over the period of 2019-2024 from four dairy farms in Germany. Six ML algorithms were applied to predict mastitis occurrence, with a focus on understanding how farm-specific factors like herd size, management practices, and farm environment may influence prediction accuracy. For training and testing on combined data, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity ranged between 83 and 92%, 78 and 93% and 83 and 92%, respectively, with an area under curve (AUC) between 91 and 96%. However, under mixed-to-individual farm effects analysis, results exposed weaknesses in the generalization. Models adapted well to internal patterns when analyzing each individual farm separately, reaching very high AUCs of up to 98%, but the results were significantly different again when analyzed with a leave-one-out approach. The analysis determined that data from each farm carries variable underlying patterns, suggesting that a tailored approach to each farm's unique characteristics might improve mastitis prediction through ML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.