Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096386›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Wool: From Properties and Structure to Genetic Insights and Sheep Improvement Strategies.

Huitong Zhou, Lingrong Bai, Shaobin Li, Jiqing Wang, Jon G H Hickford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Association ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huitong ZhouInternational Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-3160
Lingrong BaiGene-Marker Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
Shaobin LiInternational Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-1117
Jiqing WangInternational Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9811-0085
Jon G H HickfordInternational Wool Research Institute, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9313-761X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wool of sheep consists of structurally intricate natural fibres that can be processed and manufactured into a range of products. It is prized for its insulation, moisture-buffering capability, flame resistance, and biodegradability. These features arise from its unique fibre architecture and specialised protein composition, which set it apart from most other natural and synthetic fibres. However, despite these novel characteristics, wool fibre variation hampers its uses and reduces its ability to compete with other fibres. This review summarises our current knowledge of wool fibre biology. It begins with a description of wool's functional properties and performance attributes, then explores the structural foundations of these properties, the molecular basis of fibre trait variation, and prospects for improving fibre quality using genetic approaches. Particular attention is given to the wool keratin and keratin-associated protein genes, their spatiotemporal expression patterns, and genetic polymorphism that may influence fibre characteristics. Opportunities for the genetic improvement of sheep are discussed, including the use of genetic modification and marker-assisted selection. Challenges in interpreting gene-trait associations, particularly from high-throughput omics studies, are highlighted, along with the need for functionally validated genetic markers. Potential trade-offs between wool characteristics and other production and reproductive traits are considered, emphasising the need for balanced breeding approaches. By integrating insights from structural biology, molecular genetics, and breeding strategies, this review provides a foundation for wool fibre improvement.

Indexed as

breedingfibre traitgene polymorphismgenetic associationgenetic improvementkeratinkeratin-associated proteinmolecular geneticssheepwool fibrewool quality

Identifiers

PMID41096386
PMCPMC12523852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.