ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Detection and Continuous Tracking of Breeding Pigs with Ear Tag Loss: A Dual-View Synergistic Method.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lossof ear tags in breeding pigs can lead to the loss or confusion of individual identity information. Timely and accurate detection, along with continuous tracking of breeding pigs that have lost their ear tags, is crucial for improving the precision of farm management. However, considering the real-time requirements for the detection of ear tag-lost breeding pigs, coupled with tracking challenges such as similar appearances, clustered occlusion, and rapid movements of breeding pigs, this paper proposed a dual-view synergistic method for detecting ear tag-lost breeding pigs and tracking individuals. First, a lightweight ear tag loss detector was developed by combining the Cascade-TagLossDetector with a channel pruning algorithm. Second, a synergistic architecture was designed that integrates a localized top-down view with a panoramic oblique view, where the detection results of ear tag-lost breeding pigs from the localized top-down view were mapped to the panoramic oblique view for precise localization. Finally, an enhanced tracker incorporating Motion Attention was proposed to continuously track the localized ear tag-lost breeding pigs. Experimental results indicated that, during the ear tag loss detection stage for breeding pigs, the pruned detector achieved a mean average precision of 94.03% for bounding box detection and 90.16% for instance segmentation, with a parameter count of 28.04 million and a detection speed of 37.71 fps. Compared to the unpruned model, the parameter count was reduced by 20.93 million, and the detection speed increased by 12.38 fps while maintaining detection accuracy. In the tracking stage, the success rate, normalized precision, and precision of the proposed tracker reached 86.91%, 92.68%, and 89.74%, respectively, representing improvements of 4.39, 3.22, and 4.77 percentage points, respectively, compared to the baseline model. These results validated the advantages of the proposed method in terms of detection timeliness, tracking continuity, and feasibility of deployment on edge devices, providing significant reference value for managing livestock identity in breeding farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.