ReviewPolymers2025
Rheology of Dental Photopolymers for SLA/DLP/MSLA 3D Printing.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on Photocuring Printing Technology of Polyurethane Acrylate-Based Transparent Braces.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A mechanically compliant MnORSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Next-Generation Orthodontics: Functional Resins, Biomechanics, Biocompatibility, and Current Clinical Reality of Direct 3D-Printed Aligners.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- A Review of Current Systems, Materials, and Protocols for 3D-Printed Splints, Crowns, and Dentures.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Influence of Model Design and Printing Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Models for Implant-Supported Restorations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Progressing Regenerative Medicine: Integrating Bioprinting Platforms for Stem Cell Applications.Stem cells international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vat photopolymerization 3D printing, including stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), and masked SLA (mSLA), has transformed dental device fabrication by enabling precise and customizable components. However, the rheological behavior of photopolymer resins is a critical factor that governs the printability, accuracy, and performance of printed parts. This review surveys the role of viscosity, shear-thinning, and thixotropy in defining the "printability window" of dental resins and explores the relationship between these properties and the formulation and final material performance. Rheological characterization using rotational rheometry provides key insights, with shear rate sweeps and thixotropy tests quantifying whether a resin behaves as Newtonian or pseudoplastic. The literature shows that optimal printability typically requires resins with low to moderate viscosity at shear, moderate thixotropy for stability, and formulations balanced between high-strength oligomers and low-viscosity diluents. The addition of fillers modifies the viscosity and dispersion, which can improve reinforcement but may reduce print resolution if not optimized. Thermal and optical considerations are also coupled with rheology, affecting the curing depth and accuracy. In conclusion, controlling resin rheology is essential for bridging material formulation with reliable clinical outcomes, guiding both resin design and printer process optimization in modern dental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.