Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096313›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Biomaterials Science: A Review.

Andrea Martelli, Devis Bellucci, Valeria Cannillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea MartelliDepartment of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli, 10, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0538-4480
Devis BellucciDepartment of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli, 10, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-2704
Valeria CannilloDepartment of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Vivarelli, 10, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-5297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials can be defined as materials that interact positively with living tissues, restoring compromised functions, or enhancing tissue regeneration. Currently, biomaterial research often relies on a "trial-and-error method", involving numerous experiments driven largely by experience. This strategy leads to a substantial waste of resources, such as manpower, time, materials, and finances. Optimizing the process is therefore essential. A recent and promising approach to this challenge involves artificial intelligence (AI), as demonstrated by the growing number of studies in this field. AI algorithms rely on data and empower computers with decision-making capabilities, mimicking aspects of the human mind and solving complex tasks with little to no human intervention. Due to their potential, AI and its derivatives are now widely used both in everyday life and in scientific research. In biomaterials science, AI models enable data analysis, pattern recognition, and property prediction. The aim of this review article is to highlight the key results achieved through the application of AI in the field of polymers for biomedical applications and, more broadly, in the development of advanced biomaterials. An overview will be provided on how an AI algorithm works, the differences between traditional programming and AI-based approaches, and their main limitations. Finally, the core topic will be addressed by categorizing biomaterials according to material class.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomaterialsdata sciencemachine learningmaterials

Identifiers

PMID41096313
PMCPMC12526772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.