ReviewPolymers2025
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Biomaterials Science: A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design of self-assembling peptide hydrogels for neural regeneration: Principles and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Engineering Functional Biomaterials for Targeted and Localized Cancer Drug Delivery: A Structure-Property-Performance Design Perspective.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Data-driven multiscale design of composite biomaterials: Integrating experiments, imaging, and computational modeling for biomedical engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Advanced Production, Processing and Characterization of Industrial Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterials can be defined as materials that interact positively with living tissues, restoring compromised functions, or enhancing tissue regeneration. Currently, biomaterial research often relies on a "trial-and-error method", involving numerous experiments driven largely by experience. This strategy leads to a substantial waste of resources, such as manpower, time, materials, and finances. Optimizing the process is therefore essential. A recent and promising approach to this challenge involves artificial intelligence (AI), as demonstrated by the growing number of studies in this field. AI algorithms rely on data and empower computers with decision-making capabilities, mimicking aspects of the human mind and solving complex tasks with little to no human intervention. Due to their potential, AI and its derivatives are now widely used both in everyday life and in scientific research. In biomaterials science, AI models enable data analysis, pattern recognition, and property prediction. The aim of this review article is to highlight the key results achieved through the application of AI in the field of polymers for biomedical applications and, more broadly, in the development of advanced biomaterials. An overview will be provided on how an AI algorithm works, the differences between traditional programming and AI-based approaches, and their main limitations. Finally, the core topic will be addressed by categorizing biomaterials according to material class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.