Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096309›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

A Review on the Valorization of Recycled Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (rGFRP) in Mortar and Concrete: A Sustainable Alternative to Landfilling.

Mohamed Wendlassida Kaboré, Didier Perrin, Rachida Idir, Patrick Ienny, Éric Garcia-Diaz, Youssef El Bitouri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamed Wendlassida KaboréLaboratoire Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), IMT Mines Ales, University Montpellier, CNRS, F-30100 Ales, France.
Didier PerrinPCH, IMT Mines Ales, F-30100 Ales, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-540X
Rachida IdirCerema, Gustave Eiffel University, UMR MCD, F-77171 Sourdun, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-1220
Patrick IennyLaboratoire Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), IMT Mines Ales, University Montpellier, CNRS, F-30100 Ales, France.
Éric Garcia-DiazLaboratoire Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), IMT Mines Ales, University Montpellier, CNRS, F-30100 Ales, France.
Youssef El BitouriLaboratoire Mécanique et Génie Civil (LMGC), IMT Mines Ales, University Montpellier, CNRS, F-30100 Ales, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6284-299X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recycling of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) in cementitious materials is an interesting way of managing the end of life of this type of material. As the solutions of landfilling and incinerating have reached their limits, the material recovery by recycling approach appears to be suitable to develop cement-based materials with enhanced properties. Different recycling methods, including mechanical, thermal and chemical recycling, are commonly used for the recovery of fibers and resins. Mechanical recycling is more suitable due to its low cost and ease of implementation. Moreover, mechanical recycling has limited environmental impact and is ideal for use with cementitious materials (fiber and resin). Several studies are being conducted to find the best incorporation method, notably the incorporation of recycled GFRP of different sizes (small, medium, large and coarse) and shapes (fibrous, cubic, random) as a substitute for sand and/or aggregate in mortars and concretes or as reinforcement materials. This article aims to establish a state of the art perspective on the incorporation of rGFRP into cement-based materials. The benefits of this incorporation are highlighted as well as the limitations. The various challenges to be overcome to make this incorporation useful from a practical point of view are reported.

Indexed as

concretemechanical strengthrecycled glass fiber-reinforced polymer (rGFRP)recycling

Identifiers

PMID41096309
PMCPMC12526915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.