ArticlePolymers2025
Multiscale Uncertainty Quantification of Woven Composite Structures by Dual-Correlation Sampling for Stochastic Mechanical Behavior.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Woven composite structures are inherently influenced by uncertainties across multiple scales, ranging from constituent material properties to mesoscale geometric variations. These uncertainties give rise to both spatial autocorrelation and cross-correlation among material parameters, resulting in stochastic strength performance and damage morphology at the macroscopic structural level. This study established a comprehensive multiscale uncertainty quantification framework to systematically propagate uncertainties from the microscale to the macroscale. A novel dual-correlation sampling approach, based on multivariate random field (MRF) theory, was proposed to simultaneously capture spatial autocorrelation and cross-correlation with clear physical interpretability. This method enabled a realistic representation of both inter-specimen variability and intra-specimen heterogeneity of material properties. Experimental validation via in-plane tensile tests demonstrated that the proposed approach accurately predicts not only probabilistic mechanical responses but also discrete damage morphology in woven composite structures. In contrast, traditional independent sampling methods exhibited inherent limitations in representing spatially distributed correlations of material properties, leading to inaccurate predictions of stochastic structural behavior. The findings offered valuable insights into structural reliability assessment and risk management in engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.