Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096254›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Effects of Pre- and Post-Processing on Pin-Bearing Strength of 3D-Printed Composite Specimens with Circular Notches.

Yong-Hun Yu, Do-Hyeon Kim, Kang Rae Cho, Hyoung-Seock Seo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong-Hun YuDepartment of Autonomous Vehicle System Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.
Do-Hyeon KimHyundai Heavy Industries, Ulsan 44032, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-7380
Kang Rae ChoDepartment of Advanced Materials Chemistry, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1605-1032
Hyoung-Seock SeoDepartment of Autonomous Vehicle System Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5173-3667

Funding

Chungnam National University 2025-1062-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To apply 3D printing-based continuous fiber composites in shipbuilding and marine applications, the pin-bearing fastening method with notch holes can be considered as an effective method. In this study, pin-bearing strength tests were performed on a 3D-printed composite consisting of carbon fiber and Onyx to evaluate the effect of hole notches fabricated through pre- and post-processing. The experimental results showed the difference in the mechanical fastening strength of the specimens, depending on the method used to fabricate the hole notch. As the width-to-diameter ratio (W/D) decreased, ultimate bearing strength, strain, and toughness decreased. The post-treated specimens exhibited higher initial stiffness than the pre-treated specimens, and their bearing stress was up to 23% higher at smaller hole diameters (≤6 mm). In particular, for specimens with 0° fiber orientation, the post-processed specimens showed markedly higher toughness than the pre-processed ones, with increases at 5 mm and 6 mm hole diameters, respectively, thereby demonstrating superior performance in both strength and energy absorption. The damage modes of the circular notches were also found to depend on the pre- and post-processing conditions. These results suggest that fiber orientation, W/D ratio, and processing method should be considered when designing mechanical fasteners for 3D-printed composites in marine structures.

Indexed as

3D-printingbearing testcontinuous fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP)failure modefiber orientationpre- and post-processing

Identifiers

PMID41096254
PMCPMC12526860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.