Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096246›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Strength in Adhesion: A Multi-Mechanics Review Covering Tensile, Shear, Fracture, Fatigue, Creep, and Impact Behavior of Polymer Bonding in Composites.

Murat Demiral

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Murat DemiralCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 54200, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-1713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for lightweight and reliable structures across aerospace, automotive, marine, and civil engineering has driven significant advances in polymer adhesive technology. These materials serve dual roles, functioning as matrices in composites and as structural bonding agents, where they must balance strength, toughness, durability, and sometimes sustainability. Recent review efforts have greatly enriched understanding, yet most approach the topic from specialized angles-whether emphasizing nanoscale toughening, multifunctional formulations, sustainable alternatives, or microscopic failure processes in bonded joints. While such perspectives provide valuable insights, they often remain fragmented, leaving open questions about how nanoscale mechanisms translate into macroscopic reliability, how durability evolves under realistic service conditions, and how mechanical responses interact across different loading modes. To address this, the present review consolidates knowledge on the performance of polymer adhesives under tension, shear, fracture, fatigue, creep, and impact. By integrating experimental findings with computational modeling and emerging data-driven approaches, it situates localized mechanisms within a broader structure-performance framework. This unified perspective not only highlights persistent gaps-such as predictive modeling of complex failure, scalability of nanomodified systems, and long-term durability under coupled environments-but also outlines strategies for developing next-generation adhesives capable of delivering reliable, high-performance bonding solutions for demanding applications.

Indexed as

adhesive bondingcomposite structuresfatiguefracture toughnessmechanical behaviorpolymer adhesivesstructural integrityviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID41096246
PMCPMC12526568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.