Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096242›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Liquid Crystallinity in Epoxy Networks: A Systematic Study of Thermal Conductivity and Structure.

Elias Chalwatzis, Peng Lan, Frank Schönberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elias ChalwatzisFraunhofer LBF, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.
Peng LanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, 1304 W Green St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3020-3864
Frank SchönbergerFraunhofer LBF, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

Fraunhofer Internal Programs PREPARE 840072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epoxy resins are valuable in aerospace, electronics, and high-performance industries; however, their inherently low thermal conductivity (TC) limits applications requiring effective heat dissipation. Recent reports suggest that certain liquid crystalline or partially crystalline epoxy formulations can achieve higher TC, even exceeding 1 W/(m·K). To investigate this, 17 epoxy formulations were prepared, including the commonly used diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) and two custom-synthesized diepoxides: TME4, which contains rigid aromatic ester linkages with a C4 aliphatic spacer, and LCE-DP, featuring rigid imine bonds. Thermal conductivity was measured using four techniques: laser flash analysis (LFA), modified transient plane source (MTPS), time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR), and displacement thermo-optic phase spectroscopy (D-TOPS). Additionally, small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) were performed to detect crystalline or liquid crystalline domains. All formulations exhibited TC values ranging from 0.13 to 0.32 W/(m·K). The TME4-DDS systems, previously reported to be near 1 W/(m·K), consistently measured between 0.26 and 0.30 W/(m·K). Thus, under our synthesis and curing conditions, the elevated TC reported in prior studies was not reproduced, and no strong evidence of crystallinity was observed; indications of local ordering did not translate into higher conductivity. Variations in TC among methods often matched or exceeded the gains attributed to mesophase formation. More broadly, evidence for crystallinity in epoxy thermosets appears weak, consistent with the notion that crosslinking suppresses long-range ordering.

Indexed as

epoxy resinliquid crystalline epoxymeasurement methodsSAXS/WAXSthermal conductivity

Identifiers

PMID41096242
PMCPMC12526909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.