ReviewPolymers2025
Recent Advances in Porous Polymer-Based Flexible Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polymer/MXene Composite-Based Flexible Pressure Sensors: From Mechanisms and Structural Designs to Emerging Applications.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of wearable devices and intelligent human-machine interaction technologies, the demand for high-precision pressure sensors has soared. Piezoresistive pressure sensors excel due to their simple structure, low cost, and high sensitivity, among which flexible piezoresistive pressure sensors based on porous polymers have become a research focus, thanks to their unique 3D porous structure and excellent performance. This review summarizes recent advances: it introduces key performance metrics and the piezoresistive sensing mechanism; outlines porous structure preparation methods (phase separation, 3D printing, electrospinning) with their principles, advantages, and limitations; examines conductive fillers (carbon-based, polymer, metal, MXene) with their properties and applications; and highlights flexible substrates (silicone, polyurethane, polyimide, natural polymers) in ensuring mechanical compliance and device integration. Studies show material innovation, structural optimization, and process improvement can significantly enhance sensor accuracy, stability, and durability, helping break traditional performance bottlenecks. Future prospects are broad in tactile sensing, biomedical monitoring, and human-machine interaction, providing references for related research and industrial development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.