Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41096080›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Guide for Emergency Physicians.

Michela Beltrame, Mattia Bellan, Filippo Patrucco, Francesco Gavelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michela BeltrameEmergency Medicine Department, "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carità", 28100 Novara, Italy.
Mattia BellanEmergency Medicine Department, "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carità", 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1488-8736
Filippo PatruccoEmergency Medicine Department, "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carità", 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4794-8734
Francesco GavelliEmergency Medicine Department, "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carità", 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-245X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring is fundamental in the management of critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. The invasiveness of conventional devices, however, often limits their applicability in the emergency department (ED). Recent advances have introduced non-invasive modalities (including echocardiography, bioreactance, and plethysmography) that extend the use of hemodynamic assessment beyond the intensive care unit. Among various available techniques, bedside ultrasound (Point-of-Care Ultrasound, POCUS) emerges as a particularly versatile tool for rapid and comprehensive assessment of cardiac function and volume status. When integrated with continuous technologies such as bioreactance or pulse contour analysis, it allows for the adoption of more dynamic and personalized fluid management strategies. Currently, a multimodal and patient-centered approach represents the most effective paradigm for non-invasive hemodynamic evaluation in the emergency setting. This strategy enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables timely interventions guided by pathophysiological principles. Despite the inherent limitations of each technique, their integration provides emergency physicians with real-time information, with potential benefits on clinical outcomes and resource utilization. This review aims to outline the pathophysiological rationale for adopting non-invasive monitoring in the ED and to critically evaluate the advantages and limitations of each technique, providing emergency physicians with a concise framework to guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

emergency medicinefluid responsivenesshemodynamic monitoringnon-invasive cardiac output measurementshock resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID41096080
PMCPMC12524943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.