ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
From Emergency Department to Operating Room: The Role of Early Prehabilitation and Perioperative Care in Emergency Laparotomy: A Scoping Review and Practical Proposal.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency laparotomy (EL) carries high morbidity and mortality relative to elective abdominal surgery. While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles improve outcomes in elective care, their translation to emergencies is inconsistent. The emergency department (ED) provides a window for rapid risk stratification and pre-optimization, provided that interventions do not delay definitive surgery.
methodsWe conducted a PRISMA-ScR-conformant scoping review to map ED-initiated, ERAS-aligned strategies for EL. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched in February 2025. Eligible sources comprised ERAS guidelines, systematic reviews, cohort studies, consensus statements, and programmatic reports. Evidence was charted across five a priori domains: (i) ERAS standards, (ii) comparative effectiveness, (iii) ED-feasible pre-optimization, (iv) risk stratification (Emergency Surgery Score [ESS], frailty, sarcopenia), and (v) oncological emergencies.
resultsThirty-four sources met inclusion. ERAS guidelines codify rapid assessment, multimodal intraoperative care, and early postoperative rehabilitation under a strict no-delay rule. Meta-analysis and cohort data suggest ERAS-aligned pathways reduce complications and length of stay, though heterogeneity persists. ED-feasible measures include multimodal analgesia, goal-directed fluids, early safe nutrition, respiratory preparation, and anemia/micronutrient optimization (IV iron, vitamin B12, folate, vitamin D). Sarcopenia, frailty, and ESS consistently predicted adverse outcomes, supporting targeted bundle activation. Evidence from oncological emergencies indicates feasibility under no-delay governance.
conclusionsA minimal, ED-initiated, ERAS-aligned bundle is feasible, guideline-concordant, and may shorten hospitalization and reduce complications in EL. We propose a practical framework that links rapid risk stratification, opportunistic pre-optimization, and explicit continuity into intra- and postoperative care; future studies should test fidelity, costs, and outcome impact in pragmatic emergency pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.