ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
New Approaches to Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid valve diseases are an increasing cause of cardiovascular mortality, peaking in the eighth decade of life. More than 75% of severe tricuspid regurgitations are recognized via functional mechanisms, often secondary to left heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. Surgical risk for isolated correction of tricuspid regurgitation, both repair or replacement, is associated with prohibitive risk mainly in elderly patients, with several comorbidities and right ventricular dysfunction. In the past decade, different percutaneous devices have been developed to treat a large group of high-surgical-risk patients. Early diagnosis and careful patient selection are essential to improving prognosis in severe TR. Potential treatment options may vary in different stages of disease. The current available results from present studies have proven the safety and effectiveness of these devices under proper clinical indications, although selection bias and non-randomization in most investigations at present do not allow for definite indications. Ideal anatomic and clinical parameters to predict interventional success are in continuous evolution and need definite standardization. We report three cases in which different percutaneous techniques were employed for treatment when surgery was not suitable. The literature is discussed for each condition. Despite promising results in terms of safety and success rate, further randomized studies are needed to better understand which patients may be subject to long-term effects on survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.