ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Heart Transplant: A Never-Ending Story.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite ongoing advancements in the field of heart failure, heart transplantation remains the definitive treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. Decades of research, surgical innovation, and progress in transplant immunology have enabled the overcoming of persistent challenges associated with this complex procedure. Since the initial preclinical experiments involving heart transplants in canines and primates, the process has been profoundly transformed through the development of the bioptome for endomyocardial biopsies and the introduction of immunosuppressive therapies. More recently, improvements in the preservation and transportation of donor hearts, as well as the utilization of cell-free DNA for evaluating graft rejection, are laying the groundwork for further advancements in non-invasive rejection diagnosis and the expansion of the donor pool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.